From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7CB343858C66; Fri, 24 May 2024 07:47:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7CB343858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1716536844;
	bh=aaYEioyDxDDwyZhGFzMuM4KudNv69toyi46tVTaxzzI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QBAh3TyNuLEGN6HSsh8fXUs4vVbx1fE4AeYQ7YQ3yADQ9TVRFbnddUuQh805y90Pl
	 jnnfl18jrLjUy/7lujmCz7VR+e+8OMVPPXkaBr9na5ITSm7lmUjyARPHsMelTFda99
	 7E7JPTcp1/P7jZ2tIUvuj749qBO9JKX+u36wntbE=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114148] gcc.target/i386/pr106010-7b.c FAILs
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 07:47:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114148-4-BLHL9W5UPm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114148-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114148-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114148

--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot U=
ni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #4 from Hongtao Liu <liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #3)
[...]
> uoops, does below patch fix the testcase on Solaris/x86?
>
>    memcpy (pd_src, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (double));
> -  memcpy (ps_dst, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (float));
> -  memcpy (epi64_dst, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (long long));
> -  memcpy (epi32_dst, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (int));
> -  memcpy (epi16_dst, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (short));
> -  memcpy (epi8_dst, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (char));
> +  memcpy (ps_src, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (float));
> +  memcpy (epi64_src, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (long long));
> +  memcpy (epi32_src, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (int));
> +  memcpy (epi16_src, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (short));
> +  memcpy (epi8_src, p_init, 2 * N * sizeof (char));

It does indeed: tested 32 and 64-bit, and, for good measure, with all
allocators I tried before, too.

Thanks.=