public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114151] [14 Regression] weird and inefficient codegen and addressing modes since r14-9193 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:38:18 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-114151-4-JjQgZJL28n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-114151-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114151 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #21) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19) > > > > > While ranger has a range_on_exit API this doesn't work on GENERIC expressions > > as far as I can see but only SSA names but I guess that could be "fixed" > > given range_on_exit also looks at the last stmt and eventually defers to > > range_of_expr (or range_on_entry), but possibly get_tree_range needs > > variants for on_entry/on_exit (it doesn't seem to use it's 'stmt' context > > very consistently, notably not for SSA_NAMEs ...). > > That would appear to be an oversight. That API has not been used very much > for arbitrary generic trees. I think the original reason support for tree > expressions was added was a "try this" for some other PR. It was simple to > do so we lef tit in, but it never got any real traction. At least as far as > I can recall :-) > > Currently, I think mosrt, if not all, uses of get_tree_range() are either > !gimple_ssa_range_p() (commonly constants or unsupported types) or ssa_names > on abnormal edges. > > For abnormal edges, we ought to be getting the global range directly these > days instad of calling that routine. Then in get_tree_range (), we ought > to be calling range_of_expr for SSA_NAMES with the provided context. I'll > poke at that too. The support for general tree expressions changed the > original intent of the function, and it should be adjusted. > > As for the on-exit/on-entry bits... we haven't had a need for entry/exit > outside of ranger in the past. I had toyed with exporting those routines > and making them a part of the official API for value-query, but hadn't run > across the need as yet. > > Let me think about that for a minute. It can certainly be done. I guess we > really only need an on-entry and on-exit version of range_of_expr to do > everything. So if we end up with something like: > range_of_expr (r, expr, stmt) > range_of_expr_on_entry (r, expr, bb) > range_of_expr_on_exit (r, expr, bb) > > And have that all work with general trees expressions.. That would solve > much of this for you? Yes, I wouldn't mind if range_on_{entry,exit} handle general tree expressions, there's enough APIs to be confused with already ;) > > > > > > > Interestingly enough we somehow still need the > > > > > > > hunk of Andrews patch to do it :/ > > > > That probably means there is another call somewhere in the chain with no > context. However, I will say that functionality is more important than it > seems. Should have been there from the start :-P. Possibly yes. It might be we fill rangers cache with VARYING and when we re-do the query as a dependent one but with context we don't recompute it? I also only patched up a single place in SCEV with the context so I possibly missed some others that end up with a range query, for example through niter analysis that might be triggered.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-13 7:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-02-28 13:57 [Bug tree-optimization/114151] New: [14 Regression] weird and inefficient codegen and addressing modes since g:a0b1798042d033fd2cc2c806afbb77875dd2909b tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-28 14:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114151] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-28 14:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-28 16:51 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-29 7:19 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-02-29 18:15 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2024-03-01 9:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-01 15:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114151] [14 Regression] weird and inefficient codegen and addressing modes since r14-9193 amacleod at redhat dot com 2024-03-04 7:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-06 3:37 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2024-03-06 7:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-06 7:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-06 14:57 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2024-03-06 20:05 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2024-03-07 8:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-07 15:53 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2024-03-07 20:37 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-08 10:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-08 10:22 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-08 14:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-12 9:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-12 10:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-12 20:41 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2024-03-13 7:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-03-13 17:37 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2024-03-19 12:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-19 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-114151-4-JjQgZJL28n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).