From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C8BF53858C52; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:59:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C8BF53858C52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709207951;
	bh=PLrOTE5xUMVA3T/cv9vOCCfd8P3u5EwnguShz5pWdMI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=n26SIWJrVNKzUA4rK4Gs/0/6ENI2jXPxw2dnLv3a+6Z2Zl4EedXiaP1rhVIRdFZIM
	 jcWyt6Y2mVonEmLqzfRl/1zJDlNDH0L2Q6L8WFmbAsAwcInMmxFfiPVDVX9lJcqLui
	 n3MQqpYKIoRnPM/YTO9ojcxlgbyRxsI/NE2RZ7/M=
From: "harald at gigawatt dot nl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/114163] Calling member function of an incomplete type
 compiles in gcc and does not compile in clang and msvc
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:59:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, c++-lambda
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: harald at gigawatt dot nl
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-114163-4-GO2BUFupvJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114163-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114163-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114163

Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |harald at gigawatt dot nl

--- Comment #1 from Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> ---
You may be right that the class is not complete at that point but there is =
no
requirement for the class to be complete. CWG1836 changed that to "In both
cases, the class type shall be complete unless the class member access appe=
ars
in the definition of that class." Here, the class member access does appear=
 in
the definition of the class, so it's okay that the class is incomplete.=