From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5D3613858C42; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:34:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5D3613858C42 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710297279; bh=G7SOIEyHGNTNgMqdx60AHzp2YA5b2kM81T42/Nhu5HA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=epD4mDv8d961aK1N8eR3TKfSUbszvsVJqipZd7lrJYfVzyYDKc0o+QUDGF5biBfqo P1cL1C3MNMz5SbTt2pa0+H6H9R1kfT3ExAkUNtcAPrE2KiEzi1q6jOMCm5BUcjvxEd +Ffh4/PqaPLrAtABWn6BR4nGcPhSlSNuGfsCr95I= From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114175] [13/14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:34:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114175 --- Comment #22 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #21) > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #20) > > Also failing on LoongArch. >=20 > The testcase from comment 19 or the test? >=20 > Not sure if we should move the comment 19 issue into its own PR? The c23-stdarg-6.c test itself. Though I guess comment 19 test case will f= ail too.=