From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C062C3858C5F; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:09:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C062C3858C5F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709237344; bh=JqYjs6HqUe9jDasLxbT1s0r75F/A3y5BglskLhfq4Io=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eQYYzWu7NpZQhcyDsVqylUbxEa4k9/WAhPCdpdLztMevEgpjTJpD3zx2R1DsYBMzC zOBQsuQwjqmp9K+97WwIbI6/R7OyIH5rjStvKvP+z5XCR9SsXoyujXEPmU4b86yxkg 6OGLwRWfPCsJBf5mExi3uNrreQ/gL2VU3yi5lCr8= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114175] [13/14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:09:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114175 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > The arguments are passed in by the caller in a0 (the hidden struct pointer > or explicit in the other one), a1 (1), a2+a3 (2.0), a4 (3), a5+a6 (4.0). Actually a6+a7 for 4.0 instead. Anyway the caller is identical with/without the https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/646882.html patch, so I think it is something on the callee side where it doesn't take = into account the hidden return pointer.=