From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E153B385DC2F; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 22:33:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E153B385DC2F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709937224; bh=F5eQUXYoyi4uMbbXnQxBGFp8L4SCN/VqZ1PVIS/0cEQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=o4M9Jqkcpy34PeA5e7cgYvyCThd7PSsUmyI2N4ChH4udz3JaOHDyT/wXc0YnpDDDb twlZmDE1gINaMDZyUv/pH/pHiD8dDNeIG0SfojTDWmsHOgh2WnE5oBLd9vD+zZjOZ1 KazSDHH9uUv4k93g742YHF33O3lekePzgkCYPyI4= From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/114182] gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method-2.c fails for H8/300 Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 22:32:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114182 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Pinski's suggestion is the right one. We have a small number of targets th= at use 32bit doubles. For the sake of testing we should define a target test = to cleanly indicate the size of a double and check that in attr-complex-method= -2.c and likely in other places.=