From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7D4983858D1E; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 15:15:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7D4983858D1E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709392528; bh=KfPVg11kT7a6dL3GLDnjurkUOynT7CQyWdz3ZCMZcSY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bf8HQEuqPuxDmvx0d64w79y1kUfbMSDX//YSCS08lR/aCd/E2Bu+EpNoDX8ktC2bD +0CJzKF1M6eY6ujFGOZsgS7r7utFV+ryAk+bo8PTprGXk2QYoR4eMnJeUPawWajOQu OzEr1JNnDbF6W2VKRzJmDxP8S+mrHEmmW0I3966g= From: "arsen at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114206] recursive function call vs local variable addresses Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 15:15:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: arsen at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114206 Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arsen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4) > It looks like they needs to be different as they refer different objects = and > the lifetime of both object has still not ended when comparing them. this seems the case to me also=