From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1793E3858CD1; Tue,  5 Mar 2024 06:11:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1793E3858CD1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709619084;
	bh=su6ivP5a5WMfgUKqIOCeaFcLMOdaz+r5ZZbFHO+gUcA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=HP05SD3oA5Nlyc9PZ+swL+pcQgbzoXgXbdyBu7cQbuLZO98a/RF15I+5lIxwmJxuT
	 UlWOYEOQ8FhoG4DixSg0c1zRNl7Y1DwpDwPJEFhNUA7zqnIy/7F0ckS46pVfjgFvuT
	 +Ylgkhy/jPkrnMAO7YACdadgLb36BymlFoe/Q8s0=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114231] [12/13/14 regression] ICE when
 building libjxl
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 06:11:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114231-4-GxKloZWrZZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114231-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114231-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114231

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> So my reduced testcase fails for aarch64 since GCC 12 but for x86_64 only=
 on
> the trunk. I suspect the commit that it will bisect to on x86_64 is just
> enabling the pattern for x86_64.
>=20
> So if anyone does a bisect, please try on aarch64.

Note also use `-O3 -fno-vect-cost-model` for the options since -O2 might ca=
tch
when the vectorizer is turned on for -O2.=