From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 02A983858CD1; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 05:54:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 02A983858CD1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709618067; bh=7gy0e1QRge/jxIsmupH6+nw1j/RFqqh/7FYTVGvmDQs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=w1gTRyHCenI6LUvEhm0s/uH8e3uTI9J1zipsf9hBKtNSX3Q77/H//Xtw0fwguID/p qtD43etLLIT1/iHdD+Bw4LvYWC/3Mgboe+cT0vuD71WB0ZttT8W4aVcexlyB2+xOFI MT/eSlpM6QzCdf+aZbjJVV9/yv2LS3YQIZ86evPw= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114231] [12/13/14 regression] ICE when building libjxl Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 05:54:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone keywords cf_known_to_work short_desc cf_gcctarget Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114231 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|14.0 |12.4 Keywords| |needs-bisection Known to work| |11.1.0 Summary|[14 regression] ICE when |[12/13/14 regression] ICE |building libjxl |when building libjxl Target| |aarch64 x86_64 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- So my reduced testcase fails for aarch64 since GCC 12 but for x86_64 only on the trunk. I suspect the commit that it will bisect to on x86_64 is just enabling the pattern for x86_64. So if anyone does a bisect, please try on aarch64.=