From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9C07D3858C41; Tue,  5 Mar 2024 09:14:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C07D3858C41
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709630089;
	bh=b0TAcKomp6Iys41x4+aidlanorpbRIC6OKJdVHUePuY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yz+lPt67SW6rz105KUOpzbRvvoRXrKAyy9iGdt9f9HcFELLLk4V5fLhuO1fx+mZR+
	 vnapzX8qUnARvFDx/g4NsbkYpy5iiNKUsdWQGBGLWn+H4oI7PFsU+kGWUTMPTl9qtD
	 XN3JsdxZa9ghONb6ZrbTJmHkIWMgOAkx7ohyCp50=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114232] [14 regression] ICE when building rr-5.7.0 with
 LTO on x86
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 09:14:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114232-4-87pD3WPlfg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114232-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114232-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114232

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> grep optimize_ insn-flags.h | wc -l
14

so it's not very many standard patterns that would be affected.  I'd say
using these kind of flags on standard patterns is at least fragile?=