From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 721E53858D20; Tue,  5 Mar 2024 12:49:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 721E53858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709642974;
	bh=3ynhdOXWzanSu1AZEfLMTdyYdqMUO546vCDn/DswYms=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=oJK00EGh14QNfcgnMFnBlFdbfV74eRfnJ6wB9jX3IikgPZ3fHIt4mpWxFyfbIC8sr
	 5Po1HWua+afY9ydPd5Lll6JmGSm3OOiZV7T3qKgRpmlapC7sf2d05sDSyJ4x32Psrk
	 r8yT6NH4WZQEE9WgDkwxzuzLdzYUQ4wUIpYlkWLQ=
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114232] [14 regression] ICE when building rr-5.7.0 with
 LTO on x86
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 12:49:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114232-4-GmbX1P04i4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114232-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114232-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114232

--- Comment #19 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #18)
> But the problem here is more that optab initializations happens only at
> the optimization_node changes and not if we switch from hot function to
> cold?

I think solving optab init problem is a better solution than the target pat=
ch
from comment #10. Using optimize_function_for_size_p in named pattern predi=
cate
would avoid using the non-optimal pattern also in cold functions, and would=
 be
preferrable to using optimize_size.=