From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 810243858C56; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:53:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 810243858C56 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709632416; bh=XvJeOYzlWv7loG+r9C3UsZQE8Z4BRla7WMCtet1xP1w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=looQFZHRPwk93iafcG1zuGuBPYnarBJHU/cPM8uXMQgYyxBjfgNIIMwJ/66MXQnIQ qnprTBn+9LqPrEqIUf5yD8QTZpETD65acm4IDN/D74uNcmF1cc0Kfj/jp/w+xRpPAn cExD6MvTHxpAslWth0Y1ngkP9/x32a2IA0/j3ynM= From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114232] [14 regression] ICE when building rr-5.7.0 with LTO on x86 Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 09:53:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114232 --- Comment #9 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > > grep optimize_ insn-flags.h | wc -l > 14 >=20 > so it's not very many standard patterns that would be affected. I'd say > using these kind of flags on standard patterns is at least fragile? You are right, only recently added neg, add, sub, ashl, lshr, ashr V2QImode standard patterns have optimize_function_for_size_p in their condition. Any suggestion on how to fix them?=