From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6C547385829C; Thu,  7 Mar 2024 15:45:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6C547385829C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709826302;
	bh=j+Mz6duawSYElSlqdkvSpvTK+Sn6afdYGBtYqh/XhFQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LCyb6YixggLaZJsjTKlj5KRYacB+QB6a4tPViY7u5ACOlA7s5MNZkbnxHLM63endn
	 +cXuk0ur1RaVPHsTYYzzSexm1ZqbQadaSFZtcQxTH0XIRDUfnyCQNYKhOc0kAcsQu5
	 P3ceQUdPDyEOYhNNxj5aOc+bPLayaN9BPrs0zEeQ=
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114233] Newly-introduced pr113617.C test fails on Darwin
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 15:45:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure, testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114233-4-hpy7qONdfd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114233

--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3)


> The question is: will this reveal new issues in other tests that weren't
> running before. I'm starting a new regtest and will post the results here.

Well, I do not think that actually matters (perhaps if newly revealed tests
hang, it's a problem - but otherwise it's just telling us something we shou=
ld
already have known).

So, FAOD absent something drastic like a hanging testsuite, the update to t=
he
darwin-specific code in the target-supports is OK.=