From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E1C2F3858D20; Tue,  5 Mar 2024 13:20:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E1C2F3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709644803;
	bh=3B0eouZR1Lkues3bwIR+q13bc5dR1g/vZ15sxK/XjH0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jUDLtpVZ4vS+Gy1+wN9G/Of7Xt9Fbi234j4Yt+2S2t8JKFwDFrJ598OYa1NiVEUhN
	 smMoo5pxBUD7/ib31BSIr1bDdzn52Wis0iXvsoqMwzeJLVsDKvlCpCaiKktzH3PdbY
	 +sxEaV5QLWMg/SqSdmSJg79tTxUsd47YvdEANDW4=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114234] [14 Regression] verify_ssa failure
 with early-break vectorisation
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 13:20:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-114234-4-0XSVZi6tG8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114234-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114234-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114234

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sjames at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That second one is probably worth its own PR.=