From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 67D1538582A2; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 07:46:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 67D1538582A2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709711186; bh=QsTa8Np0/D/Nhh859xcxeu5sEodlZEoaeiYRMRB2Ux0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZCJkoH6WHbVBrFkujyMWHpQgdtzPsGvsw1dCb1f4D1pkJ0GPAgyBJpd2lPG8gooln R+Bmywn8hsvLte4B3MfeQNZfpGffvVWkalAw7/0XEvBIJyS40RB1LiyRS7bpujkgJV v+OG+kqdQU0j3a4nRkrBMKI9ui0bkN3nzh8Mwt5I= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/114241] False-positive -Wodr warning when using -flto and -fno-semantic-interposition Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 07:46:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114241 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail| |13.2.1 Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-06 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed also with GCC 13. I guess we're optimizing things in a strange (invalid) way before WPA and get confused because of that. Honza?=