From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A28B13858C3A; Wed,  6 Mar 2024 11:59:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A28B13858C3A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709726344;
	bh=esjWstU4uis1IQpt0hetzkLlNCyqft7rRxO7EVN1o74=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lAHMk9gPB7ojAyrHBCchyVG9SfGcTKKTpt6rJ55MwrYRBrQPhnr0rNh75xUxkRjQa
	 9jHiVBDF5IHqEbcQlfywdUeJcCBu0zxvaOJs28ZpmsaYa/bd5n5hU0dJ9vtmHh/LWg
	 k6PmyiFc7/ksQeQYKuB9J60XCfDhBS2YQzHL64dE=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114252] Introducing bswapsi reduces code performance
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:59:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114252-4-AitUSqLEiY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114252-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114252-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114252

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looking at avr.md there's no bswap implementation, only the libcall.  Why
expose it this way?

I suppose the pattern was added to get bswap recognition, so this is what y=
ou
get if you do that?=