From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 755813857832; Thu,  7 Mar 2024 15:02:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 755813857832
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709823770;
	bh=yrSgoj7pGDe4vvHM3/YJbrf8MG9J9k/rZa37VThO7Aw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QmRYw0xsTtsX53Bgp6E2B4HiDKsk8wALsmPym5DXOD3/tvIHf8jl8X0N1oA4VVTLr
	 tNuUvv1y7uSHKVIibaQIFYb0sfxx20k9+aLRrrwXyGP5XWi7L2SA6sKi51RyKqSD9l
	 X+o/c67ZGMVTR470p6B1LpLtE4JMKJlrVRN0vNEQ=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114252] Introducing bswapsi reduces code performance
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 15:02:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114252-4-iIlywgChi3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114252-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114252-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114252

--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note one thing that might help is define an alternative for bswap that take=
s a
memory operand and just do the load that way. That will definitely help in =
the
original code.=