From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7A76C385801F; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:23:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7A76C385801F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709749430; bh=FhwkOKw7xkX5MTTKmzG9N4sCFQdR82yTtzIbVf3TZm4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mA3ICqyBQga1ZhWlQaPJXPLE0JfbJWF4y+bPcZ7Yw1GBq0RrfOLilG+fGhMTvcHa4 lLxlYQUFH33jsJHAFuaFJLMTojF+aS6a0cG6Vwaf0672SuBSvVb9LNK6BJzlpB+5ZH 1QXXCTIIL9b1RZPgDalmPTBJu4ACSi+8H+lmT4Mk= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/114258] 2 stores happen when copying from a const union (array) to an union Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 18:23:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on component bug_severity short_desc everconfirmed keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114258 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-06 Component|rtl-optimization |middle-end Severity|normal |enhancement Summary|repeat store operation when |2 stores happen when |copying a union |copying from a const union | |(array) to an union Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Reduced testcase: ``` union U6 { short f0; int f1; }; union U6 g_13; void func_1() { static const union U6 b[] =3D {{.f0 =3D 2}, {.f0 =3D 2}}; g_13 =3D b[1]; } ``` It comes from the expansion of the assignment. For aarch64 we have: ``` ;; g_13 =3D b[1]; (insn 5 4 6 (set (reg:DI 101) (high:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("*.LANCHOR0") [flags 0x182]))) "/app/example.cpp":9:8 -1 (nil)) (insn 6 5 7 (set (reg/f:DI 100) (lo_sum:DI (reg:DI 101) (symbol_ref:DI ("*.LANCHOR0") [flags 0x182]))) "/app/example.cpp":9:8 -1 (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (symbol_ref:DI ("*.LANCHOR0") [flags 0x182]) (nil))) (insn 7 6 8 (set (mem/c:SI (reg/f:DI 100) [1 g_13D.4435+0 S4 A64]) (const_int 0 [0])) "/app/example.cpp":9:8 -1 (nil)) (insn 8 7 9 (set (reg:HI 102) (const_int 2 [0x2])) "/app/example.cpp":9:8 -1 (nil)) (insn 9 8 10 (set (mem/c:HI (reg/f:DI 100) [2 g_13D.4435+0 S2 A64]) (reg:HI 102)) "/app/example.cpp":9:8 -1 (nil)) (insn 10 9 11 (set (mem/c:SI (reg/f:DI 100) [1 g_13D.4435+0 S4 A64]) (const_int 0 [0])) "/app/example.cpp":9:8 -1 (nil)) (insn 11 10 12 (set (reg:HI 103) (const_int 2 [0x2])) "/app/example.cpp":9:8 -1 (nil)) (insn 12 11 0 (set (mem/c:HI (reg/f:DI 100) [2 g_13D.4435+0 S2 A64]) (reg:HI 103)) "/app/example.cpp":9:8 -1 (nil)) ``` GCC could do better here in the expansion.=