From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 37F053858C42; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:09:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 37F053858C42
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710299399;
	bh=RWh5OPFOJmDqMGhvIMDx/PemSjguI59DaZ6Gt5bG1zE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IkezIafbXbStWourDvt5V5EWMNwd9w6UKsAKWIuMCNk9WZg6M0F9yTidJs6i3nkMy
	 NcD6G/HTVmF0392LJJgfLgh4fJC2TjytpyjOx7sxe7m0p4Gyi0/PT4OANEroItzV0a
	 ZhqgwOVpWOGXLl9vCjLkf53wN+DhRJSHtOfByRlM=
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/114261] [13/14 Regression] Scheduling takes
 excessive time (97%) since r13-5154-g733a1b777f1
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:09:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114261-4-lIye6rmU8l@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114261-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114261-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114261

--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yea, there are various limits on the size of various lists the scheduler
maintains.  This looks independent of those various clamps.=