public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "antoshkka at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/114270] New: Integer multiplication on floating point constant with conversion back to integer is not optimized
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 15:31:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-114270-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114270

            Bug ID: 114270
           Summary: Integer multiplication on floating point constant with
                    conversion back to integer is not optimized
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: antoshkka at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Consider the following example:

unsigned test(unsigned x) {
    return (unsigned)(x * 0.5);
}

With -O2 GCC generates the code with a fair conversion to fp and
multiplication:

test(unsigned int):
  mov edi, edi
  pxor xmm0, xmm0
  cvtsi2sd xmm0, rdi
  mulsd xmm0, QWORD PTR .LC0[rip]
  cvttsd2si rax, xmm0
  ret

However the multiplication does not overflow and the floating point constant is
a normal number.

A more optimal code should look like the following:

test(unsigned int):
  mov eax, edi
  shr eax
  ret

Probably the optimization could be used for
* any multiplication of integer on positive fp-number less or equal to 1.0
* any division of integer on positive fp-number greater or equal to 1.0
if the result is converted back to integer

             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-07 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-07 15:31 antoshkka at gmail dot com [this message]
2024-03-07 15:50 ` [Bug middle-end/114270] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-08  8:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-08  9:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-114270-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).