public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114281] [14 Regression] Multiple 2-10% exec time regressions of 465.tonto since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:08:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-114281-4-AjF6LHjsYC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-114281-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114281

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
                 CC|                            |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #0)
> Our LNT instance has detected that runtime of benchmark 465.tonto from the
> SPEC 2006 suite regressed on all of our machines (aarch64 ampere altra,
> intel skylake, amd zen{2,3,4}) on most configurations by 2-10%.
> 
> One example: Zen4 -Ofast -flto -march=native (regressed by 10%)
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=992.230.0
> 
> I've bisected the example configuration to r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033 (Richard
> Biener: tree-optimization/114074 - CHREC multiplication and undefined
> overflow).
> 
> There have been two other SPEC benchmarks regressions reported that also got
> bisected to this commit -- pr114269, pr114238. I assume that all of these
> have the same cause.

Please don't open more tickets unless you are assuming they do *not* have the
same cause.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 114269 ***

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-08 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-08  9:33 [Bug tree-optimization/114281] New: " pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-08 10:08 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-03-08 10:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114281] " pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-114281-4-AjF6LHjsYC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).