From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 435CD3858C31; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 10:08:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 435CD3858C31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709892491; bh=n/ruw+A76YwUIGl+7/bdQLvGN43ZJQNaGHF/LxNPQyY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=i1v/DOjfuZ5Avig15EOP0Z061cgLZNvL8Nh8kPDKQddTBCpa1u3PxRysY4VQQmFMJ 7edPLEMtN3DbGsATIz/hh8bvxwVIQvEJ1BVWD8/HOXfmwG81yXSqBJy6v4uKRsRwjB vArkg3AQmzuIPIGGZO3rOVcKwFixHSlWrkq741aA= From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114281] [14 Regression] Multiple 2-10% exec time regressions of 465.tonto since r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033 Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:08:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114281 Xi Ruoyao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC| |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #0) > Our LNT instance has detected that runtime of benchmark 465.tonto from the > SPEC 2006 suite regressed on all of our machines (aarch64 ampere altra, > intel skylake, amd zen{2,3,4}) on most configurations by 2-10%. >=20 > One example: Zen4 -Ofast -flto -march=3Dnative (regressed by 10%) > https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D992.230.0 >=20 > I've bisected the example configuration to r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033 (Rich= ard > Biener: tree-optimization/114074 - CHREC multiplication and undefined > overflow). >=20 > There have been two other SPEC benchmarks regressions reported that also = got > bisected to this commit -- pr114269, pr114238. I assume that all of these > have the same cause. Please don't open more tickets unless you are assuming they do *not* have t= he same cause. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 114269 ***=