From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5623E3858D33; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:12:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5623E3858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709903525; bh=PmCvBW1yuLLS/vn6Ti0rCZUSdeDScb8LbVm0UqXcy+o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=C4sw3DcPcIeLYyKHa1lJ4Own1BKigqWQAw8vM8iIgZ3Y3w2ZKP46c17Ch8gAisd9v Q+wzwW/cBkXy8+9JC8GabSTdwSHwCPYXS4DbstOhKjglOduhkavxBVq7usPuCd9Urb 0zfkTQTEwFsinxiQrKnbn4oH6SOSIM7w2XNoe+og= From: "acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114284] New: [14 Regression] arm: Load of volatile short gets miscompiled (loaded twice) Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 13:12:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114284 Bug ID: 114284 Summary: [14 Regression] arm: Load of volatile short gets miscompiled (loaded twice) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following is a wrong code regression in GCC 14: volatile short x; short foo() { return x; } with -march=3Darmv8-m.base -O2 on the trunk we get: foo: movw r3, #:lower16:.LANCHOR0 movt r3, #:upper16:.LANCHOR0 ldrh r2, [r3] movs r0, #0 ldrsh r0, [r3, r0] bx lr i.e. x is loaded twice, but with GCC 13 we get: foo: movw r3, #:lower16:.LANCHOR0 movt r3, #:upper16:.LANCHOR0 ldrh r0, [r3] sxth r0, r0 bx lr I suppose ideally we would have just one ldrsh, but the GCC 13 code is OK.=