From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 22FB93858416; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:23:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 22FB93858416 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710026584; bh=uQmZoWZncwjAkw8mJSNXGzPJyOISl8PgLEldwa8h89c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GQeQkPJW8L+F1Uo1QTF3y59KLx8edWd87di5XOBtN7ceNGW47hDiUBk8zAMgLRas6 CyLtwt8GiiHRo8+gAJcdITCoxtzlGBOls0VXepWrEWUKF2WM7+y4I9ucvQcQ9XlGZS uwM3q532OEzwME/v4aPAukCmAX84+ymtcID8pHbE= From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114288] [14 regression] ICE when building binutils-2.41 on hppa (extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2713) Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 23:23:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114288 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- Sure, that's fine (I would've CC'd you for your opinion if you weren't here already). I know you were reluctant already with the m68k PR, but figured t= his was different enough to suggest it given the other one is analysed at least. Understood.=