From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B81FE385841E; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 20:07:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B81FE385841E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712606874;
	bh=aH+9CwZp6OrZutdVpVaRXpZPbEH4K75FcO1ohoNJWtA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XuiGxv3HsEfu5BDRhShP3CRfIAyRy+0Kr8uNaGn/BRgm73epe+NU/Hevg5v1el9Kr
	 XimRRLJLXwsIM/UdU+Q4LE37cU3Q/W1rIBRK0DWpJmrxiYqTMwXn9W4p4sSwoCQ1Da
	 lTZttSDXNM8gCTcbA+dRLq8dEXdcRQKy/S6ihA8Q=
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBsaWJmb3J0cmFuLzExNDMwNF0gWzEzLzE0IFJlZ3Jlc3Np?=
 =?UTF-8?B?b25dIGxpYmdmb3J0cmFuIEkvTyDigJMgYm9ndXMgIlNlbWljb2xvbiBub3Qg?=
 =?UTF-8?B?YWxsb3dlZCBhcyBzZXBhcmF0b3Igd2l0aCBERUNJTUFMPSdwb2ludCci?=
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 20:07:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114304-4-dAkmENZ4SQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114304

--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #28)
> Created attachment 57896 [details]
> Testcase
>=20
--- snip ---

> I think we need at least an "|| c =3D=3D '\t'"; I guess '\r' isn't really
> required here, or is it?

The particular snippit that broke the tab is only executed at the beginning
read of the first effective item so we dont need anythin else at this spot.=