From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 68AD3385828D; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:42:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 68AD3385828D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710261722;
	bh=Wcb07UrmeGmCKN8CY9HfkutbRUAZf7xKPzV3YCGvQus=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XWosqm2uTrYnQ0IqXAbvv4JR4vvSorrRB7Fs52ivua1Z6G2CHHgGp11V2fmW9eY+2
	 ABXMKVhNSo78FrL8YLOUljvYUKmkAHqp6SBTkn6OSmQMwheLW/iZMA6fr12cuWZznb
	 hNfW2t1UU8/pKrUkxv7GOQjhjh4MkaCHCBKPie2M=
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBsaWJmb3J0cmFuLzExNDMwNF0gWzEzLzE0IFJlZ3Jlc3Np?=
 =?UTF-8?B?b25dIGxpYmdmb3J0cmFuIEkvTyDigJMgYm9ndXMgIlNlbWljb2xvbiBub3Qg?=
 =?UTF-8?B?YWxsb3dlZCBhcyBzZXBhcmF0b3Igd2l0aCBERUNJTUFMPSdwb2ludCci?=
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:42:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114304-4-iAKB7pzrg9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114304

--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #14)
--- snip ---
> The question is whether the following show give an error as shown above:
>   real :: x(3)
>   character(len=3D1) :: s
>   ...
>   write(99, '(a)') '1.23435 1243.24 13.24 ;'
>   read(99, *) x, s
>=20
> Or whether reading this line should work, i.e. reading ';' as character =
=E2=80=93 as
> it does with ifort and flang.
>=20
> Or in other words:
> * Does ';' count as character, readable by list-directed formatted I/O?
> (ifort, ifx, flang)
> * Or doesn't it? (gfortran since at least 4.9)
>=20

This error caught my attention right away as being odd. With the regression
part out of the way at the moment I will study this further. My initial tho=
ught
is we have an eat_seprator out of place where we only need an eat_spaces.
Regardless, I am looking into it.=