From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1577B3858C98; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:13:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1577B3858C98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710159239;
	bh=4Y29s5q5Xi5JHrvAww1aK1Gs/ADwFrBmkBWifaWAd6c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=u/mGrgOku/8LAI53QneXGTTdnUvhikM876TcVM+kRxOIiLv0B2l5WVnpFrJxuWxHn
	 OeQRr0ouYkwIvVvOzXc8/A1A+7i91NLxCRTKmjgQUJEhWLaF3YTohmBQwfGpeHlyHL
	 m1uCmklZbaZwzFz9SGjBYtGjIjtPv1uQysij5SRc=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/114306] wrong diagnostic with -Waddress (enabled by -Wall)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:13:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114306-4-VrR0iJGs78@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114306-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114306-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114306

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think the warning is correct as:
(condA>0 ? cont->value : (int*)NULL)

Here cont->value can never be null due to c rules.

The above can be simplified to just

`condA>0` then. See pr 102967 too.=