From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D8A2B3858012; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:45:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D8A2B3858012
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710254707;
	bh=TkxJ7N2kXjJHEteRDnIjShH2r74luWaFTtnrXLr7fMs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kULG7XWM3nZbz6rPfsRhtNAHRhrVWBnrAyYVIZCGTcCm5bl1XvkenM/3tRnrmhY4N
	 H+S6Rgg2IWc9VaHCjigmol8cOYQeFpJDbhWN4/1GRZ7ZJZ77FVoQEpNwMrf5l/jG45
	 ugeFOSNgk79fHZ9paWDiJtwnoDUSnF+YTT6aRI8A=
From: "mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/114307] [ARM] GCC generates instruction that
 assembler rejects
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:45:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114307-4-Ej3JcDBEfF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114307-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114307-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114307

--- Comment #4 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
What I don't understand is why vect.exp tests run at all for 32-bit ARM
non-neon targets.

All vect.exp are predicated on check_vect_support_and_set_flags, which, as =
far
as I can tell, has only arm_neon_ok clause for 32-bit ARM.

I'm reproducing this problem locally to understand .exp flow.  If anyone kn=
ows
the answer off-hand -- please share.

Thanks!=