From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4AC64385840B; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 20:48:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4AC64385840B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710190082;
	bh=OSETwWMZIG7+0qGPq4S7Yx6JXr6zheZHwnU8AlI88HY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hPPyVDVM8sphQMuQJ33dAWZIQUCwYwOJqypCt8wMsXaoScOk3m+P7SmZNEZo/zSAN
	 JFIYwuvr25sU2eoTLMBqw8z/b+EJQwn1YyygRG/BWsbK3pOIrSnJnXphKnHFfja3HN
	 Fq/ktuARpOSW1hCHSnH/4+NHS3fzkmQUA3ZaoZlA=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/114313] ICE: in limb_access_type, at
 gimple-lower-bitint.cc:591 with _BitInt() in a bitfield
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 20:48:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on component
 everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-114313-4-t5kKGhIlvS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114313

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-03-11
          Component|tree-optimization           |middle-end
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.

Easier testcase:
```
#define size 129
struct
{
  _BitInt(size) a : size;
  _BitInt(size) b : size;
} bf;

int
foo (void)
{
  return bf.b;
}
```

Note changing the bitfield size down to below 128 allows the above not to I=
CE.=