From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 65C153857C60; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:54:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65C153857C60 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710442459; bh=WM37CUGjjiedT5fCRYiPT/C2FruB5ZIO/kRB/wc2Puk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IEn7i2h7ZBkE0jTDyCuTeCO3kJ+gBQ5vkaxTQMYlMnHdlHKFZQi5xnHPZP4J+W68g Dw8+v9dLmZZu18WklZZbQ01Uib0lmQQFC9trQxF60cu9oPKJ8CxbU9C1T4lhsHbTQw KSZe6lbTz22sokJ1QE6NaY01U/9T535/EfLda9c0= From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114339] [14 regression] Tor miscompiled with -O2 -mavx -fno-vect-cost-model Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:54:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114339 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > Created attachment 57705 [details] > larger.i >=20 > Ah, wait, that might be a bad reduction. Let me attach a larger one, then= I > can give the original if needed too. OK, no, I think https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114339#c2 is= fine.=