From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EBD573858C78; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 03:51:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EBD573858C78
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710906662;
	bh=OmqjKgBT9nf+aVfoT8+wpENt7lrbgkpHUPm6CBYaSRE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eCLGshlyrGbFj6YxC7Frvi3MDRxM6bz2Q0S2Mj40jCHbftlMsMZEHD3gufyCRoqju
	 s0mAYVNwC3a2ku97HtFJbX1hoCped3/W4ss/3n9n/HfPgvKfA/qVt1M8DGN/0znZ+1
	 poD0gY9jK+EB5c2MrEPXORL74vTkdkX7uqxfW8sA=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/114393] [14 regression] over eager "invalid use of void
 expression" ? since r14-2170-g4cf64d9cc2faf4
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 03:51:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-114393-4-lqRTUiEcx2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114393-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114393-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114393

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |c++-lambda

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This might come down to:
```
template <class _Descriptor, auto t =3D [] { return _Descriptor();}>
inline constexpr auto __descriptor_fn_v =3D t;
```

being handled wrong.=