public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "prlw1 at cam dot ac.uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/114393] New: over eager "invalid use of void expression" ? Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:09:06 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-114393-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114393 Bug ID: 114393 Summary: over eager "invalid use of void expression" ? Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: prlw1 at cam dot ac.uk Target Milestone: --- When trying to use the reference implementation of the `std::execution` proposal over at https://github.com/nvidia/stdexec, I get errors of the form /usr/src/local/stdexec/include/exec/async_scope.hpp:735:31: error: invalid use of void expression 735 | return when_empty(just()); with `g++ (GCC) 14.0.1 20240318 (experimental)` In https://github.com/NVIDIA/stdexec/issues/1285 Eric Niebler traces this to a__make_sexpr invocations which can't ever have type void. The easiest way to reproduce this is to see the standard example on goldbolt: https://godbolt.org/z/3cseorf7M It compiles fine with gcc 12.3 and 13.2 (even with `-Wall -Wextra --pendantic-errors`, but not with gcc trunk, which possibly suggests a regression. I have been using stdexec successfully for a while with trunk. Old checkouts of stdexec which used to work (with maybe gcc trunk from about 2 months ago?) now fail, which also points towards a change in gcc rather than in stdexec.
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 11:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-03-19 11:09 prlw1 at cam dot ac.uk [this message] 2024-03-19 11:29 ` [Bug c++/114393] [14 regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-19 11:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-19 11:56 ` [Bug c++/114393] [14 regression] over eager "invalid use of void expression" ? since r14-2170-g4cf64d9cc2faf4 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-19 22:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-20 3:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-20 4:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-25 19:05 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-29 23:49 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-12 19:08 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-12 19:09 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-12 19:11 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-14 19:27 ` prlw1 at cam dot ac.uk
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-114393-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).