public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model since r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:09:44 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-114403-4-cRJGI4nmmC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-114403-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Just as hint we've had wrong upper bounds on vectorized loops/epilogues which would trigger wrong unrolling. But then unrolling also always hints as eventually having wrong range-info.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-26 10:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-03-20 10:44 [Bug tree-optimization/114403] New: [14 regression] sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-20 10:44 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-20 10:53 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-20 11:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-20 17:23 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114403] [14 regression] LLVM miscompiled with -O3 -march=znver2 -fno-vect-cost-model since r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-20 21:27 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-21 3:23 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 9:47 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 9:50 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 10:56 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 11:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 12:36 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 13:12 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 13:13 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 13:13 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 13:27 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 13:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 13:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 14:27 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-22 14:37 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-26 10:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-04-02 13:26 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-02 16:41 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-11 21:40 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-11 21:52 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-12 10:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-12 10:15 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-12 10:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-12 10:40 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-12 11:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-15 11:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-15 11:08 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-16 19:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-114403-4-cRJGI4nmmC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).