From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0920C3858D28; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:44:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0920C3858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711014286;
	bh=h4Mmz2V/UaXJ1/rla6IdNulZDiAtI804n+0xxizL/vc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xC2SkkJxQ+32yela/dWBviKGnihkEbJ0YhUGpJbUkkYx134/FumIneNlhKltcJ1IC
	 r+Fj3XyI9fmnOkrp3WnnKETbapMvTXNisSjlsibtPLUj65OFCv35oQufs5THcu2Ktc
	 ulDcyibPOt8UxlV+wLS82xYZyn07LPIV15Ytsw/U=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114412] [14 Regression] 7% slowdown of 436.cactusADM on
 aarch64
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:44:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-114412-4-zpUYirqd1a@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114412-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114412-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114412

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |14.0

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Compared to GCC 13 (~april in the graph) it's even 16% combined.=