From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CB6FB3858D28; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:12:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CB6FB3858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711627922;
	bh=O+vPYf3lsedPCkj42pFR+ttJtY5vI6gTZORJPK7wkTE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=SglFANLIr96HBM6IgonXyZ4JZyFUwZBhB9066EOZIM0DHx3Q6FIt3HyMbNJUqE+6B
	 JxtefZH+P3p2KnI/wLy59oKSbEXQd4Z1tu1q0YSxxiky+r2iKlRAKmwfeMH/tBx0SU
	 2r4a9cUdrw0we66LCN2n0Y6q1kZmcqEpI9vZ0FYI=
From: "pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114414] 15-18% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on Zen2
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:12:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-114414-4-tN7ks3pvJq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114414-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114414-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114414

Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It looks like the benchmark went back to its original values so I'm closing
this PR.=