From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B70133849AD3; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 07:26:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B70133849AD3
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713943617;
	bh=BM6bdzxPT4lmKrKrBDLrW10il3Xfl1TGAyL6RSe9i4g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=AC+ws2gAD5fHPbv4YJxxu8k/4WctNDuWzr1ivvyUGhrKXdQWlRJB5+roEEMutcN3I
	 PobS0mzHXHODVZG7sJaAmFNyWm4jsjazD8GZKo7BcGNpsv5LI+PwNSsgVwv5hp8ra4
	 gf1b7LyVKYigFe0dVxbBfYTMNb13dtGBI8t0OrUs=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor
 compiler for V9
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 07:26:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114416-4-CCMrw1LGFW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114416

--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK, thanks, let's go ahead for Solaris then, but I agree that we'd better do
nothing for other platforms at this point.

Do you happen to have some spare cycles to conduct a testing cycle of the a=
bove
tentative fix?  It only affects the 64-bit ABI so a sparc64/sparcv9 one wou=
ld
be sufficient (Unfortunately I no longer have access to my SPARC/Solaris se=
tup
and haven't tried the Compile Farm yet).=