From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 59EF0384641C; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:29:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 59EF0384641C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714037368;
	bh=MXtfvEWg0ALrTZ/m0vmNmfTSJlXesl3zqBhbf3bSYDM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=g3Y8Jv04+9/OJ2w31NgDgwVdx7JdM1HHAKcrlz49EVwo/4gyE3jJ8NywoZe8b0mc0
	 PSYxfz5KXoUlD7qXMJ/Y4KnHAgm512nkv7GO5aLwu1Yl7P6yw+pKajUyVNU9RIF7kW
	 EOuW3QCVx2BwAVDBo9lxYn4tlba6gc8kkH9EGmJ0=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor
 compiler for V9
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:29:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114416-4-H1kPxi8EUz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114416

--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot =
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
> Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[...]
>>> The sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu one will be running for a couple more
>>> hours, though.
>>
>> The change should be a no-op for this platform.
>
> True.  However, I'd rather wait for the bootstrap to complete.  Should
> be sometime tonight...

That's finished now, too, and as expected there were no regressions.=