public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub.kulik at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor compiler for V9 Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:49:37 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-114416-4-bO7J3ntvLw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-114416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416 Jakub Kulik <jakub.kulik at oracle dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub.kulik at oracle dot com --- Comment #6 from Jakub Kulik <jakub.kulik at oracle dot com> --- Thank you for the proposed fix! I tested it with several programs that I used to find/reproduce the issue and it seems to work now (I talked about this with Rainer initially). As for the ABI being potentially unclear, I am in no way a SPARCv9 ABI expert, so I asked internally, and was told that the ABI should be clear about this case: """ See page 3P-10 (PDF page 46) where it says this: %f0,%f1,%f2,%f3 (%d0, %d2) (%q0) Floating-point return values appear in the floating-point registers. Single-precision values occupy %f0; double-precision values occupy %d0; quad-precision values occupy %q0. (Refer to the SPARCTM Architecture Manual, Version 9 for details on the register numbering scheme). Otherwise, these are scratch registers. and %f0 through %f7 (%d0 through %d6) (%q0 and %q4) Floating-point fields from structure return values with a total size of 32 bytes or less appear in the floating-point registers. Then on page 3P-13 (PDF page 49) it says this: Structure or Union return values Structure and union return types up to thirty-two bytes in size are returned in registers. The registers are assigned as if the value was being passed as the first argument to a function with a known prototype. So we have to refer back to "Structure and Union arguments" on page 3P-12 (PDF page 48) where it says: "Structure or union types are always left-justified, whether stored in registers or memory. *The individual fields of a structure (or containing storage unit in the case of bit fields) are subject to promotion into registers based on their type using the same rules as apply to scalar values* (with the addition that a single-precision floating-point number assigned to the left half of an argument slot will be promoted into the corresponding even-numbered float register.)." [sic; emphasis added.] """
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 9:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-03-21 13:00 [Bug target/114416] New: SPARC V9 struct return with floating-point members violates ABI ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-21 13:00 ` [Bug target/114416] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-21 13:01 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-21 14:54 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-21 15:08 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2024-03-24 10:42 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-25 9:02 ` [Bug target/114416] calling convention incompatibility with vendor compiler for V9 ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-27 9:49 ` jakub.kulik at oracle dot com [this message] 2024-03-27 9:56 ` jakub.kulik at oracle dot com 2024-03-27 10:13 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-27 10:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-17 14:06 ` jakub.kulik at oracle dot com 2024-04-17 14:08 ` jakub.kulik at oracle dot com 2024-04-23 8:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-23 11:34 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2024-04-24 7:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-24 7:31 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2024-04-24 12:17 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2024-04-24 12:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-24 12:34 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2024-04-25 9:29 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2024-04-25 10:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-25 10:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-25 11:01 ` jakub.kulik at oracle dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-114416-4-bO7J3ntvLw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).