From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E3A2D3858D37; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 18:55:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E3A2D3858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711220137;
	bh=SbdcJPqMSxbgvNpQsNbI9I87GwjfUTCbTk8+J5NSaZY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DQ0QAuXaPb5nUJGeFf2f52WRGFetP8HRU9u37lR4hSYghZi6JoRxQ+TiUou/wLSdF
	 SOY4G/6TwcXLBJLM59sghSNmhwZiYqNAdIoz7PXpG0Phaz+Fi18Fm8KtmBFvcODAnN
	 ryGtgayz8/hfn+5cjqLlLFvI5PsgZVw3Sn7WLOV8=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/114424] gnat: Ada.Calendar.Clock crashes on 32bit
 architectures with 64bit time_t
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 18:55:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution cc
Message-ID: <bug-114424-4-udbor4Gxy2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114424-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114424-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114424

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Why don"t you use s-osprim__posix2008.adb if you use s-parame__posix2008.ad=
s?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 114065 ***=