public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug d/114434] New: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs
@ 2024-03-22 15:26 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-03-22 15:26 ` [Bug d/114434] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-22 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114434

            Bug ID: 114434
           Summary: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: d
          Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
          Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
            Target: amd64-pc-solaris2.11, sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

The gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d test FAILs on Solaris (64-bit only) since
its introduction:

FAIL: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d   execution test
FAIL: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d -shared-libphobos   execution test

core.exception.AssertError@runnable/test23514.d(12): Assertion failure
----------------
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime/rt/deh.d:51 _d_createTrace
[0x4dbeeb]
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime/gcc/deh.d:484 _d_throw
[0x4c54b9]
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime/core/exception.d:556
onAssertError [0x4a536c]
??:? _Dmain [0x4a0ee6]

The weird thing is that performing the comparison in gdb works.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug d/114434] gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs
  2024-03-22 15:26 [Bug d/114434] New: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-22 15:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-03-22 15:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-22 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114434

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |14.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug d/114434] gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs
  2024-03-22 15:26 [Bug d/114434] New: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-03-22 15:26 ` [Bug d/114434] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-22 15:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-05-07  7:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-22 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114434

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|amd64-pc-solaris2.11,       |i386-pc-solaris2.11,
                   |sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11     |sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
                   |                            |i386-apple-darwin1[15],
                   |                            |i686-pc-linux-gnu

--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I just noticed that this only happens for a 32-bit-default compiler, and is
also
seen on Darwin/i386 and Linux/i686.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug d/114434] gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs
  2024-03-22 15:26 [Bug d/114434] New: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-03-22 15:26 ` [Bug d/114434] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-03-22 15:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-05-07  7:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-06-02 12:49 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-06-03  7:47 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-07  7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114434

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|14.0                        |14.2

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 14.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 14.2.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug d/114434] gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs
  2024-03-22 15:26 [Bug d/114434] New: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-05-07  7:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-06-02 12:49 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-06-03  7:47 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-02 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114434

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I see the test is pointer + 64-bit int.  Is this UB on 32bit pointer platforms?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug d/114434] gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs
  2024-03-22 15:26 [Bug d/114434] New: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-06-02 12:49 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-06-03  7:47 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2024-06-03  7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114434

--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I see the test is pointer + 64-bit int.  Is this UB on 32bit pointer platforms?

You're right: I only see the failure when d21 is a 32-bit binary; 64-bit
d21 is ok.  However, both are supposed to work the same in multilibbed
configurations.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-03  7:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-22 15:26 [Bug d/114434] New: gdc.test/runnable/test23514.d FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22 15:26 ` [Bug d/114434] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22 15:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07  7:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-02 12:49 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-03  7:47 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).