From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AD3FC3858D33; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 23:25:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AD3FC3858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711409118;
	bh=VdT8oQ20/CuHRXxeW81yB7Ph5jJiPTLezLyukRvCf0w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=FWyTh1FrCyVh1Uv9ys8D5BoAtKWDQw5fvMClCXzyNJ/RkqQeXco75tYGt4vScqdVz
	 Wz+FA5Bvg4kKbJamW3uCzjmzIv6YTkpwWxcwSyCyINM47MVVKSA2yRodaKApKWGv/4
	 I+gjFWYHiBtrBQPVIDGwzzSVZzTj1FSeiF5yC+p0=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114468] unixbench compilation performance results vary
 with different gcc compilers (r10-6804-g3133bed5d0327e)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 23:25:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also
Message-ID: <bug-114468-4-CXOcwIwxoO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114468-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114468-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114468

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26944

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Also one should note that register allocation is NP complete problem. So
obvious tuning heurstics for one case will most likely cause issues for oth=
ers.

Also dhrystone benchmark is very much not a decent benchmark for real code.=