From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 99DFC3858D3C; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:16:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 99DFC3858D3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1711430165; bh=e3Yn3Ld/CILcOCn9qHugseIPxlajkcrKdBQU1pjNWvI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DZ9I30SkPNn2J9JetHoBHVDZjJn5tlUOU8k46/xDJ8uP2lnnNjCZa8C1/Jn/FGrzG M3+0ET70t6Aq6t8zVlFDKFO4XtxhGlvZL5rWWl6FgVyviaPv77F9pg64U2Hlo4skpK 5RsJDeOPu+8Az8SeNieRPlqfGyRSIabTPMwzBf/0= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114476] [13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fwrapv -O3 -fno-vector-cost-mode (and -march=armv9-a+sve2 on aarch64 and -march=rv64gcv on riscv) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:16:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114476 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Here is a testcase where we don't need -fwrapv: Ignore that, I was doing something wrong.=