public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/114480] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 09:54:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-114480-4-GNEpHYl1ap@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-114480-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480

--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, douglas.boffey at gmail dot com wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
> 
> --- Comment #23 from Douglas Boffey <douglas.boffey at gmail dot com> ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> > Note we're using -Wl,--stack,12582912 when linking the GCC executables, I
> > wonder
> > if the reporter can verify the segfaulting executables have the correct stack
> > size set?
> 
> How do I find that out?

googling tells me

dumpbin /headers executable.exe

which should show a "size of stack reserve".  Alternatively if you
have objdump from binutils that might also show this info.  Basically
it's encoded in the binary (you want to check cc1plus.exe here).

There's also

editbin /stack:N executable.exe

where you can alter the stack reserve of the binary to N

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-26 11:40 [Bug c++/114480] New: " douglas.boffey at gmail dot com
2024-03-26 11:42 ` [Bug c++/114480] " douglas.boffey at gmail dot com
2024-03-26 11:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 11:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 11:51 ` douglas.boffey at gmail dot com
2024-03-26 12:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 12:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 12:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 12:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-26 12:31 ` douglas.boffey at gmail dot com
2024-03-26 12:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-27  8:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-27 19:49 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28  8:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28  8:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 10:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-28 10:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-02 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-03  6:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-03 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-04  9:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-04 18:41 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-05 15:35 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08  9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08  9:50 ` douglas.boffey at gmail dot com
2024-04-08  9:54 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2024-04-08 12:32 ` douglas.boffey at gmail dot com
2024-04-08 13:07 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-04-08 13:22 ` [Bug c++/114480] [12/13/14 Regression " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 13:37 ` [Bug c++/114480] [12/13/14 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-09  7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-09 11:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-14 13:41 ` [Bug c++/114480] [12/13/14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-17 12:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-114480-4-GNEpHYl1ap@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).