From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0FB2F3858437; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:04:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0FB2F3858437
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711508643;
	bh=oQbMmYp4Wc/4dKqeo8OiaG4L2BwZx/26g9HEXRySqPU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yeXsjOtDRLlQbIFM5Fqgl0iIQw1yrULwmR+AdGCWn/YLTLAZjdF42/bGInwUbHml9
	 HpugmC+9yX8c75ndAoJNyhMAnhga9N9AiRqEwEuJCJlAfY8L3IsfgekE+V4bk3+4B2
	 Z2xrG3v9z+SnZVBuh1c+vH+viVVtuUiSuw+pYMxE=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114492] Invalid use of gcc_assert (notably in
 gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:04:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-114492-4-a6rV6xfxxA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114492

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-03-27

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>Please be advised that the argument is *not* evaluated with release checki=
ng

Actually it is evaluated with release checking as release checking enables
assert checking.
But it is not evaluated for `--without-checking` or `--with-checking=3Dnone=
`.

It has been done that way since release checking was added in
r0-61420-ge1bbfc5cc2dd04 .

Before that yes assert checking was NOT enabled for releases.



The 2 I see which might be an issue is:
  gcc_assert (crtl->ssa->verify_insn_changes (changes));

    gcc_assert (rtl_ssa::restrict_movement_ignoring (*changes[i],
is_changing));=