From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 206D4385843A; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:12:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 206D4385843A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1711527128; bh=7R1jVYO7UecFICp9kfzfQZEM0ORkK1+FKY/6ldqtDlg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=hEzKh56mZDnfXRa8XaQt5PrCO8nYky98bHItuuEFVplL2N6vpYTrGn1WDkicGMOlj cu+xa6Jw1cIpBY9HtFvi2H/l2W+0StdLJC85NuSLqIQUJgmKaX6Y0STuQa+aNnFXyc 09+R7oMiC3zT1a2ATxnRc9l8lPAxBPugDWqsccRw= From: "Explorer09 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug web/114496] New: Documentation: "Non-Bugs" page should update/mention something about -Wsign-conversion Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:12:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: web X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Explorer09 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114496 Bug ID: 114496 Summary: Documentation: "Non-Bugs" page should update/mention something about -Wsign-conversion Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: Explorer09 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Section 14.8 of GCC manual "Certain Changes We Don=E2=80=99t Want to Make" (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Non-bugs.html) This item: > Warning about assigning a signed value to an unsigned variable. > Such assignments must be very common; warning about them would cause more= annoyance than good. Perhaps GCC should clarify this a bit. GCC now has the "-Wsign-conversion" option that warns about similar signed-to-unsigned conversions. So what fea= ture in particular did GCC choose not to implement? The difference between this "non-bug" item and the existing "-Wsign-conversion" is what I wish to see.=