From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8263F3858427; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:25:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8263F3858427
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711585526;
	bh=ORYKOlNaLrOgHYBI2x6kYVGJUbCmqbrGu+vkIdlq3f4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eMl75XD2EAyJpaZJFq+4g1a37NrrVRjVDcJ9MR0dCLND0k6o5n/VwyaA7wEm5kHPL
	 iauPyRuMYMdmvFYqDcrhjZbZx01T6U5OcaVzN+7ujktt29KA5fJjobVVacFGASpM6j
	 Vji1VaMnBpgNL/LDE1dIKCSA9OX2PI51iI7nu0ik=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/114505] static archives built with gcc --without-zstd cause
 ICE when read by gcc with zstd support
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:25:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, needs-reduction
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-114505-4-CE594AT1pD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114505-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114505-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114505

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needs-reduction

--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> THis should not case should not being ICE and should be handled correctly=
. I
> am thinking something else is wrong.
>=20
> Now the opposite direction is definitely should be a fatal_error instead =
of
> an internal_error.

I'm pretty sure I've seen the ICE before (when I forgot to strip the LTO
sections from a fat LTO archive built by a "GCC w/o zstd" to produce a non-=
LTO
archive).

Just need to find a test case...=