From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D4E653858D28; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:31:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D4E653858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711603901;
	bh=/USYdRhY5LCX1M3n+tLUHmUbOTdfBdioXKTCtyFJ3oU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pdNMwdwUI30te0xhEn92smdvm8+vMMbJufLhKLB9kSJ4fbFZLGTV/nst4nvunyV1N
	 Oe4reauYWm1xas+iIofIBFVDghlMwJoFXVsh0izHUnhCHFLol/ERclGp6vipKv373Z
	 4phcEOz4O8566XuEYm2wbG+azJf/sYCw6vWepPmU=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/114507] FR: Randomize order of evluation of function of
 arguments
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:31:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114507-4-rBaD1VujfS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114507

--- Comment #2 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That said, I feel as if it's more likely this is better for the analyser.=