From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 691593858D28; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:19:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 691593858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711621187;
	bh=UTHxzoHJ4XmeQz95yL7Y8ecylmAquZWk9oOXS1oeCSU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=CbfhK0QlFTdiL0b7P0/0C3JXAEu9x4qxycEDsCcsHBsM9yn3EKkgC0bJi0gQcAgZb
	 2mt3eRu07qHfdok7ige03aXSstmBGjVbUqnOdc/Ye2cgkOS2+kDVYv8MnVBf7gUL6G
	 EHDJn6N1t3/xwtdAwnjQabOxo/j8OMr7gP+Zbe7I=
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/114515] [14 Regression] Failure to use aarch64
 lane forms after PR101523
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:19:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114515-4-pRxAqzSnFH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114515

--- Comment #3 from Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In RTL terms, the dup is vec_duplicate.  The combination is:

Trying 10 -> 13:
   10: r107:V4SF=3Dvec_duplicate(r115:SF)
      REG_DEAD r115:SF
   13: r110:V4SF=3Dr111:V4SF*r107:V4SF
      REG_DEAD r111:V4SF
Failed to match this instruction:
(parallel [
        (set (reg:V4SF 110 [ _2 ])
            (mult:V4SF (vec_duplicate:V4SF (reg:SF 115))
                (reg:V4SF 111 [ *ptr_6(D) ])))
        (set (reg:V4SF 107)
            (vec_duplicate:V4SF (reg:SF 115)))
    ])
Failed to match this instruction:
(parallel [
        (set (reg:V4SF 110 [ _2 ])
            (mult:V4SF (vec_duplicate:V4SF (reg:SF 115))
                (reg:V4SF 111 [ *ptr_6(D) ])))
        (set (reg:V4SF 107)
            (vec_duplicate:V4SF (reg:SF 115)))
    ])
Successfully matched this instruction:
(set (reg:V4SF 107)
    (vec_duplicate:V4SF (reg:SF 115)))
Successfully matched this instruction:
(set (reg:V4SF 110 [ _2 ])
    (mult:V4SF (vec_duplicate:V4SF (reg:SF 115))
        (reg:V4SF 111 [ *ptr_6(D) ])))
allowing combination of insns 10 and 13
original costs 8 + 20 =3D 28
replacement costs 8 + 20 =3D 28
modifying insn i2    10: r107:V4SF=3Dvec_duplicate(r115:SF)
deferring rescan insn with uid =3D 10.
modifying insn i3    13: r110:V4SF=3Dvec_duplicate(r115:SF)*r111:V4SF
      REG_DEAD r115:SF
      REG_DEAD r111:V4SF
deferring rescan insn with uid =3D 13.=