From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1ECAD3858D20; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:08:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1ECAD3858D20 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1711656504; bh=T/Lh1FzHEPQmPs4WgxM/xsdrIM4sE3T7dxKZJo6Ek0M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Q51d+lK9o5upKGstNzoDT9BlnO768ZdiP//QPKgXcSoXt35x47BusBrA5+1isRSGX iVF0qGhzJHsS8Jytb7uEVaUXzDWHqnw8SXW91Zna2lTAGZPytV29nxbsDK8oAF5Xr3 tEmS8KFUnh+fL8zK/WpgQwGW9qePgvWJysXELn0s= From: "dragonroot at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/114525] New: Incorrect code generated when setting a value through a pointer-to-member on a ternary returning an object reference Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:08:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dragonroot at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114525 Bug ID: 114525 Summary: Incorrect code generated when setting a value through a pointer-to-member on a ternary returning an object reference Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dragonroot at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The following program incorrectly outputs 1 on every GCC I've tried (via godbolt.org), while every clang version there correctly outputs 2. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D #include struct Foo { int x; }; Foo & get( Foo & v ) { return v; } int main() { Foo v; v.x =3D 1; bool cond =3D true; ( cond ? get( v ) : get( v ) ).*( &Foo::x ) =3D 2; // Should output 2, but outputs 1 printf( "%d\n", v.x ); } =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=