From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B44483858CDA; Tue,  2 Apr 2024 16:20:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B44483858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712074819;
	bh=25VzjML0zphWcHIF3yb11QxQkKN9DFN6N4MK2H52c2Q=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=O9qCk6fsMKYlpy2t9ioLLSeHj4vmTEkjwWeoJJTYk8tONV9BUV7f3MB8rn0nI2Y1C
	 GFyv4xtt7VauhLUiq3OqgG0jQ5ELyG826Le4IF/iz/akKHyjpAEBaGQgucc1u8BlxQ
	 jeXgf5ZWLcQfAlPY68WbL0FmFjDUzN24HY4kaoQo=
From: "harald at gigawatt dot nl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/114526] ISO C does not prohibit extensions: fix
 misconception.
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 16:20:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: harald at gigawatt dot nl
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114526-4-9lgITGGbts@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114526-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114526-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114526

--- Comment #10 from Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> ---
Sorry, sent my earlier comment too soon.

(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #8)
> I believe conversions between function and object pointers are undefined =
as
> a property of the translation unit - not of a particular execution.

But there is nothing in the standard to support this. The standard fully
defines the behaviour of the program I posted, which is just to return 0.=